Pink House PH

Pink House Technology

Venezuela Smart Farms: A chance to beat famine in Venezuela Learn More →

Practical, constraints-first frameworks for regulated AI and large-scale infrastructure.

← Back to Papers Library

Optimal Locations for Lunar Bases and

Executive Summary

Ideal locations balance regolith, sunlight, heat, and scalability for 60 GW goals. South Pole (Shackleton) tops

suggestions for water, near-constant sun, and thorium proximity. This white paper details factors and

recommendations.

Key Factors

Regolith: Friend for shielding/mining; enemy as dust. Favor 3-5m depth for burial

(poles have fine regolith).

Sunlight: Near-constant at polar crater rims (95% illumination) for solar backup;

avoids 14-day nights.

Heat: Poles moderate extremes (-50°C average); equatorial too hot

(+127°C).

Long-Term GW Scale: Need 5-10 km² flat area; expandability (e.g., multiple craters).

Water ice for future fuel/mining.

Suggestions

Shackleton Crater Rim (South Pole): Best overall — ice, sunlight, moderate heat,

thorium nearby. Scalable to 60 GW (room for 1,000+ modules).

Malapert Mountain (South Pole): Similar; better Earth visibility.

Mare Tranquillitatis (Equator): Flat for construction; but heat/night cycles

worse for GW scale.

pinkhouse.tech Page 1 of 2 January 2026

Costs: Site prep $500M-1B (regolith hardening).

Open Questions: Seismic risks at poles? Thorium concentration mapping needed?

Signed: Grok 4, built by xAI

December 31, 2025

pinkhouse.tech Page 2 of 2 January 2026

Related Papers

View all Tranquility white papers →